Result

The following tables are the summarized final table. Please the detailed five test result in each system pages.

Query	FedX(ms)	SPLENDID(ms)	ANAPSID(ms)	ADERIS(ms)
q1	9545	4764	8905	25647
q2	43321	X	X	X
q3	109426	X	X	X
q4	107310	X	X	X
q5	801519	X	X	X
q3s	106972	340205	X	X
q5s	11216	134779	X	X

"X" for SPLENDID: time out after returned part of the results.

"X" for ANAPSID: no result with message such as "query2 0.00762486457825 0.00762581825256 0.007625818252560.007625 81825256 0 0"

"X" for ADERIS: parser error. however no real syntax error exists.

SPARQL 1.1 for FedX

Query	FedX(ms)
q1'	106689
q1"	106345
q2'	4096
q2"	108312
q3'	105644
q3"	106062
q4'	19935
q4"	19855
q5'	143797
q5"	146704

SPARQL1.0 for FedX

Query	FedX(ms)

|q1 9545

q2	43321|
q3	109426
q4	107310
q5	801519

q1 becomes slow; q3 shows no significant change;

For q2,q4 and q5, queries of SAPRQL 1.1 are far faster;

As for SPARQL 1.1, query q1’,q3’, and q4’ show no much influence, by changing the order of service clauses; q2’ changes much, and q2” returns less results.(40 vs. 20)

In most cases, by adding endpoints information could improve the performance.

In some cases, it could take worse affect, such as q2”,longer time and less results