バージョン 44 から バージョン 45 における更新: summarize

更新日時:

2012/07/03 15:18:49 (12 年 前)

更新者:

wu

コメント:

--

summarize

@@ -11 +11 @@
  ** It needs another 17 hours to decompress and split the data set.
 
- # We do not test 4Store on larger data set because its scability is not ideal. From about 100M Allie dataset to 500M PDBJ data set the time cost increases 500 times. 
+ # We do not test 4Store on larger data set because its scalability is not ideal. From about 100M Allie data set to 500M PDBJ data set the time cost increases 500 times. 
 
  X Some Problem occurred when uploading the data. Please refer to its uploading procedure for details.
@@ -33 +33 @@
 ||4Store (ms)           ||  56|| 18|| '''1236'''|| 13|| '''33'''|| '''64'''|| 22|| 67|| 2035|| 7|| '''6'''|| 1563|| 8 ||7|| * ||X||X||X|| 15 ||
 || Mulgara(ms)          ||  1294     ||  20     ||   2207  ||   9  ||    343  ||2325|| 32|| 58||33||4||14||X||9||6||X||X||X||X||38||
-[[Image(cellcycle_bar.bmp)]] [[Image(cellcycle_pie.bmp)]] 
+
+ X or * shows that the endpoint does not support "count()" function or some unsupported function causes a wrong result.
+
+[[Image(cellcycle_bar.bmp)]] [[Image(cellcycle_pie.bmp)]] The pie chart shows that how many percent an end point accounts for the fastest performers.
+
+ 
+
+The data shows that:
+
+(1)Virtuoso supports more query. In some cases Virtuoso response fast but some others cost far more than others, such as case5 and case19;
+
+(2)Except that OwlimSE cannot support count() function, it totally perform better and has no worst case;
+
+(3)Bigdata and Mulgara perform averagely well;
+
+(4) 4Store do not support count() and give no response in case15. However it performs distinctively better in some cases such as case5 and case6.
+ 
 
 '''Query for Allie:'''